A- de 2019
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice José Fernando Reyes Cuartas
✓Claimant Maria Catalina Jaramillo Hernandez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Improcedencia por silencio del actor durante oportunidad procesal otorgada en el auto inadmisorio
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica.
El rechazo se dio porque la demandante no presentó escrito de subsanación de la demanda y, en consecuencia, no corrigió los defectos señalados en el auto de inadmisión.
La Sala Plena considera que la radical inactividad de la actora en la etapa surtida ante la magistrada sustanciadora, motiva su decisión de CONFIRMAR la providencia cuestionada.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. CONFIRMAR el auto del 02 de julio de 2019, dictado por la Magistrada sustanciadora Cristina Pardo Schlesinger, por medio del cual rechazo la demanda identificada con el numero de radicacion D-13231.
- Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.